Legislature(1993 - 1994)
1993-05-11 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1993-05-11 House Journal Page 1902 SB 7 The following which had been moved to the bottom of today's calendar (page 1893), was read the second time: CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 7(FIN) am(reengrossed) "An Act relating to school construction grants and major maintenance grants to school districts; providing for school district participation in the cost of school construction and major maintenance; creating a major maintenance grant fund; relating to reimbursement of school construction debt, and to school construction bonds issued by the Alaska Municipal Bond Bank Authority; creating an education facilities maintenance and construction fund; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page STA REFERRAL WAIVED 1646 HES REFERRAL WAIVED 1647 SENATE REQUEST RETURN TO SENATE 1657 RETURNED TO SENATE 1673 FIN RPT 7DP 3NR 1AM 1877 -FISCAL NOTE (DOE) 5/10/93 1877 1993-05-11 House Journal Page 1903 SB 7 Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Ulmer: Page 12, line 10: Delete "1998" Insert "1996" Page 14, line 30: Delete "1998" Insert "1996" Representative Ulmer moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Navarre: Page 12, line 9, after "section": Insert "may not exceed $250,000,000." Page 12, lines 9 - 16: Delete all material Page 14, line 27 through page 15, line 6: Delete all material Page 14, line 27, following "$250,000,000": Insert "may only be issued to fund school construction, additions to schools, or major school rehabilitation projects that are approved under AS 14.07.020 (a)(11) [300,000,000]." Representative Navarre moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. 1993-05-11 House Journal Page 1904 SB 7 Representative Phillips objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 7(FIN) am H Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 28 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brown, Carney, Davidson, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Hoffman, Larson, Mackie, Menard, Navarre, Sitton, Ulmer Nays: Barnes, Brice, Bunde, Davies, B.Davis, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hudson, James, Kott, MacLean, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Nicholia, Nordlund, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams, Willis And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative Navarre: Page 3, lines 7 - 9: Delete "100,001 - 200,000 10 percent 200,001 - 600,000 30 percent over 600,000 35 percent" Insert "100,001 - 200,000 15 percent over 200,000 25 percent" Representative Navarre moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative Phillips objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1993-05-11 House Journal Page 1905 SB 7 CSSB 7(FIN) am H Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 15 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Carney, Davidson, Davies, B.Davis, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Hoffman, Mackie, Menard, Navarre, Nicholia, Sitton, Willis Nays: Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hudson, James, Kott, Larson, MacLean, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Nordlund, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Ulmer, Vezey, Williams And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. Amendment No. 4 was offered by Representative Navarre: Page 12, line 11: Delete "133,000,000" Insert "100,000,000" Page 12, line 13: Delete "67,000,000" Insert "50,000,000" Page 12, line 15: Delete "50,000,000" Insert "100,000,000" Page 14, line 31: Delete "133,000,000" Insert "100,000,000" 1993-05-11 House Journal Page 1906 SB 7 Page 15, line 2: Delete "67,000,000" Insert "50,000,000" Page 15, line 5: Delete "50,000,000" Insert "100,000,000" Representative Navarre moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 4 be adopted. Representative Phillips objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 7(FIN) am H Second Reading Amendment No. 4 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 31 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Carney, Davidson, Grussendorf, Hoffman, Mackie, Menard, Navarre, Nicholia, Ulmer Nays: Barnes, Brice, Brown, Bunde, Davies, B.Davis, G.Davis, Finkelstein, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hudson, James, Kott, Larson, MacLean, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Nordlund, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Sitton, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams, Willis And so, Amendment No. 4 was not adopted. Amendment No. 5 was offered by Representative Navarre: Page 12, line 11: Delete "133,000,000" Insert "120,000,000" 1993-05-11 House Journal Page 1907 SB 7 Page 12, line 13: Delete "67,000,000" Insert "60,000,000" Page 12, line 15: Delete "50,000,000" Insert "70,000,000" Page 14, line 31: Delete "133,000,000" Insert "120,000,000" Page 15, line 2: Delete "67,000,000" Insert "60,000,000" Page 15, line 5: Delete "50,000,000" Insert "70,000,000" Representative Navarre moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 5 be adopted. Representative Phillips objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 5 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 7(FIN) am H Second Reading Amendment No. 5 YEAS: 10 NAYS: 30 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Carney, Davidson, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Hoffman, Mackie, Menard, Navarre, Nicholia, Ulmer 1993-05-11 House Journal Page 1908 SB 7 Nays: Barnes, Brice, Brown, Bunde, Davies, B.Davis, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hudson, James, Kott, Larson, MacLean, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Nordlund, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Sitton, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams, Willis And so, Amendment No. 5 was not adopted. Amendment No. 6 was offered by Representative Navarre: Page 12, line 11: Delete "133,000,000" Insert "123,000,000" Page 12, line 13: Delete "67,000,000" Insert "62,000,000" Page 12, line 15: Delete "50,000,000" Insert "65,000,000" Page 14, line 31: Delete "133,000,000" Insert "123,000,000" Page 15, line 2: Delete "67,000,000" Insert "62,000,000" Page 15, line 5: Delete "50,000,000" Insert "65,000,000" Representative Navarre moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 6 be adopted. 1993-05-11 House Journal Page 1909 SB 7 Representative Phillips objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 6 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 7(FIN) am H Second Reading Amendment No. 6 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 29 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brown, Carney, Davidson, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Hoffman, Mackie, Menard, Navarre, Nicholia, Ulmer Nays: Barnes, Brice, Bunde, Davies, B.Davis, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hudson, James, Kott, Larson, MacLean, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Nordlund, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Sitton, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams, Willis And so, Amendment No. 6 was not adopted. Amendment No. 7 was offered by Representative Navarre: Page 3, line 14: Delete "200,000" Insert "600,000" Representative Navarre moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 7 be adopted. Representative Phillips objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 7 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 7(FIN) am H Second Reading Amendment No. 7 YEAS: 17 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 1993-05-11 House Journal Page 1910 SB 7 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Carney, Davidson, Davies, B.Davis, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Hoffman, Mackie, Menard, Navarre, Nicholia, Nordlund, Sitton, Ulmer, Willis Nays: Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hudson, James, Kott, Larson, MacLean, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams And so, Amendment No. 7 was not adopted. Amendment No. 8 was offered by Representative Navarre: Page 12, line 9: Delete "250,000,000" Insert "300,000,000" Page 12, line 15: Delete "50,000,000" Insert "100,000,000" Page 14, line 25: Delete "550,000,000" Insert "600,000,000" Page 14, line 26: Delete "250,000,000" Insert "300,000,000" Page 15, line 5: Delete "50,000,000" Insert "100,000,000" Representative Navarre moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 8 be adopted. Representative Phillips objected. 1993-05-11 House Journal Page 1911 SB 7 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 8 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 7(FIN) am H Second Reading Amendment No. 8 YEAS: 14 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Carney, Davidson, Davies, B.Davis, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Mackie, Menard, Navarre, Nicholia, Nordlund, Sitton Nays: Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hoffman, Hudson, James, Kott, Larson, MacLean, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Ulmer, Vezey, Williams, Willis And so, Amendment No. 8 was not adopted. Representative Phillips moved and asked unanimous consent that CSSB 7(FIN) am H be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. Representative Navarre objected. The question being: "Shall CSSB 7(FIN) am H be advanced to third reading on the same day?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 7(FIN) am H Second Reading Advance to Third Reading YEAS: 38 NAYS: 2 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Barnes, Brice, Brown, Bunde, Carney, Davies, B.Davis, G.Davis, Finkelstein, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Hoffman, Hudson, James, Kott, Larson, Mackie, MacLean, Martin, Menard, Moses, Mulder, Nicholia, Nordlund, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Sitton, Therriault, Toohey, Ulmer, Vezey, Williams, Willis 1993-05-11 House Journal Page 1912 SB 7 Nays: Davidson, Navarre Mackie changed from "Nay" to "Yea". Willis changed from "Nay" to "Yea". Brice changed from "Nay" to "Yea". Davies changed from "Nay" to "Yea". Sitton changed from "Nay" to "Yea". Grussendorf changed from "Nay" to "Yea". Brown changed from "Nay" to "Yea". Nordlund changed from "Nay" to "Yea". Menard changed from "Nay" to "Yea". Carney changed from "Nay" to "Yea". Hoffman changed from "Nay" to "Yea". Nicholia changed from "Nay" to "Yea". And so, the motion passed. CSSB 7(FIN) am H was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CSSB 7(FIN) am H pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 7(FIN) am H Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 40 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Barnes, Brice, Brown, Bunde, Carney, Davidson, Davies, B.Davis, G.Davis, Finkelstein, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Hoffman, Hudson, James, Kott, Larson, Mackie, MacLean, Martin, Menard, Moses, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Nordlund, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Sitton, Therriault, Toohey, Ulmer, Vezey, Williams, Willis And so, CSSB 7(FIN) am H passed the House. Representative Phillips moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. 1993-05-11 House Journal Page 1913 SB 7 CSSB 7(FIN) am H was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.